week 1

The Fashion Space Race: Prada and NASA Redefine the Future of Space-Age Couture

By Cassidy Crockett

With the announcement of Prada's collaboration with NASA on lunar spacesuits for the Artemis III mission, the worlds of high fashion and space exploration have converged in a celestial union. The cosmos meets couture, and the ripple effect could forever change the landscape of fashion as we know it. To truly appreciate the significance of this collaboration, it is necessary that we explore the history and emergence of space-age fashion and its profound connection to the 1960s.

In the 1960s, the Space Race to the Moon was the ultimate symbol of American ingenuity and ambition. The allure of outer space cast a spell on the nation, shaping not only technological progress but also the cultural zeitgeist of the era. Space-age-themed pop culture dominated American households, with the iconic series Star Trek and visionary films like 2001: A Space Odyssey capturing the imagination of millions. The era's technological advancements gave rise to innovations such as memory foam and LED lighting, but they also extended their reach into the world of fashion.

Design luminaries like Paco Rabanne, Pierre Cardin, and Courrèges emerged as trailblazers of this new space-age aesthetic. Their collections were nothing short of innovative and daring, introducing chainmail shift dresses, stark white boots, and glistening metallics that graced magazine covers and boutiques across the nation. Space-themed helmets and modular sunglasses became the new norm, reflecting the era's boundless curiosity about the future and the technological progress that was revolutionizing our world. Fashion became a vessel for the exploration of uncharted territory and the embodiment of a new futuristic era.

Fast forward to today, and the fascination with outer space is far from extinguished. In fact, the Prada-NASA collaboration has reignited the American obsession with space-age fashion and the anticipation of technological breakthroughs yet to come. As Prada's engineers and designers craft outfits for the lunar surface, the potential for transformative change in the fashion industry looms large. This revival of space-age fashion extends beyond the cosmos and could usher in an era of inclusivity and design that caters to a broader spectrum of individuals. I predict that NASA's research into adaptive technology, including shape-memory materials, could pave the way for innovative clothing designs for individuals with mobility challenges or disabilities, enhancing their quality of life.

The Prada-NASA collaboration represents the nexus of many worlds: past and future, technology and design, and, most importantly, the unity of diverse perspectives. As these lunar spacesuits prepare to make history, they offer more than just a giant leap for mankind; they present a giant leap for the world of fashion and inclusivity. Prada, NASA, and the spirit of the space-age era are rekindling the cosmic flame of creativity and innovation for unparalleled designs and a brighter future for all.

Redefining Luxury: The Democratization of Fashion in the Age of Consumerism

By Devon Lee

For years, the luxury fashion industry has been closely associated with exclusivity and opulence. It was a privilege reserved for the wealthy few who could afford designer labels and high-end couture. However, the fashion industry has undergone a significant transformation due to the domination of fast fashion and consumerism culture. The democratization of fashion has emerged as a powerful and transformative force, reshaping the luxury industry and challenging its traditional notions.

Among the myriad factors at play, the first to be addressed deals with the accessibility of luxury to the modern American consumer. American consumers wield substantial purchasing power, prompting numerous luxury fashion brands to leverage it for heightened sales and revenue. In 2020, the United States led the personal luxury goods market with around 65 billion U.S dollars in revenue. By 2028, the ranking by revenue in the luxury goods market is expected to be led by the United States with 83.3 billion U.S. dollars establishing the U.S as one of the largest and most affluent consumer markets in the world. The strong U.S. economy makes it an attractive market for luxury brands looking to expand and generate substantial profits. As a result of the high demand for products and greater financial status of the American middle class, Luxury brands expanded their interests into catering American consumerism at the expense of their integrity as a luxury brand.

Competition in this newly democratized market can result in price wars and cost-cutting measures. The race to the top can compromise product integrity and quality, negatively affecting consumers who will probably receive subpar items. In order to maximize profits, many corporations seek out ways to cut corners. Several brands, including Prada and Chanel, have already adopted cost-effective materials and outsourced their manufacturing to developing nations while misleadingly asserting that their products originate solely from Europe. According to Christina Passariello, writer for the Wall Street Journal, 20% of Prada’s goods are manufactured in China. Dana Thomas, cultural and fashion writer of Newsweek Paris for 12 years, marks the emergence of the Prada nylon backpack of the 2000s as “the emblem of the radical change that luxury was undergoing at the time: the shift from small family businesses of beautifully handcrafted goods to global corporations selling to the middle market.” Thomas emphasizes this was a turning point from exclusivity to accessibility. A shift from tradition and quality to branding and profits.

The democratization of luxury carries heavy social implications. Though it has led to a more inclusive consumer culture, Luxury democratization is the erosion of exclusivity and now raises questions of what constitutes luxury fashion. As luxury becomes more accessible, it loses its appeal as a symbol of prestige and status. The very essence of luxury, which is built on scarcity and high-quality, has been compromised.

As a product and response to assert status and wealth, luxury becomes more and more focused on abundance. The more you have the better, and this new idea of what it means to be “fashionable” in a luxury sphere becomes detrimental to the environment. It leads to unsustainable consumption patterns. People able to afford luxury items may be more prone to following trends and making frequent purchases, contributing to excessive consumption and waste. This posits the question of whether luxury industries should moderate roles of consumer indulgence. For example, the French brand Hermès adheres to an allocation bag system, rejecting mass production. This practice restricts access to their goods, maintaining exclusivity and preventing overconsumption.

Reactions to a now inclusive and democratic luxury fashion market have been mixed. Anna Wintour, editor of Vogue, expresses her positivity “more people are going to get better fashion” and “the more people who can have fashion, the better.” Donna Thomas, writer for Newswriter, holds a more pessimistic and elitist view, “The luxury industry has changed the way people dress…It has realigned our economic class system. It has changed the way we interact with others. It has become part of our social fabric. To achieve this, it has sacrificed its integrity, undermined its products, tarnished its history and hoodwinked its consumers. In order to make luxury ‘accessible,’ tycoons have stripped away all that has made it special, Luxury has lost its luster.”

Luxury fashion finds itself at a pivotal juncture. The democratization of luxury, while promoting a more inclusive consumer culture, is at risk of losing the very essence of luxury which encompasses exclusivity and quality. This shift towards consumer indulgence in the pursuit of profit growth leads to mass-produced goods, unsustainable consumption patterns, and waste. As the luxury fashion industry grapples with these changes, it faces a delicate balancing act between making its products more accessible and preserving the qualities that have defined luxury over the years. The democratization of luxury has undeniably brought forth both opportunities and challenges, and its ultimate impact on the industry’s identity and future remains an intriguing and evolving narrative.

LVMH Sales Stagnate Amidst Luxury Retail’s Exiting Creative Directors

De Sarno gives a glimpse into the future of Gucci.

By Dee Kwong

The sign of the luxury market growing slower becomes more apparent as LVMH reveals its earnings reports for the third quarter last Tuesday. In LVMH’s fashion and leather goods sector, including major brands like Louis Vuitton and Dior, sales only grew nine percent in Q3. The figure is not small by any means. However, compared to last year’s doubled growth rate and the figure falling three percent short of industry predictions, it is clear that luxury is not selling as it was.

Outside LVMH’s conglomerate of luxury goods, owner of Gucci, Saint Laurent, and Alexander McQueen, Kering’s North American sales were down 23 percent early this summer. Around the same time, Burberry’s sales fell eight percent, while Prada was down six percent.

In the post-COVID world of stimulus checks, pent-up savings, and the internet’s presentation of ‘luxury’ through its aggressive curation of trends—think, old money and quiet luxury—the rate of Americans making $50,000 and less account for 27 percent of the regular luxury goods sector according to GlobalData. That’s about the same percentage of middle-class spenders.

Yet, how did the personal luxury goods market reach its record-breaking growth of $345 billion in 2022, only to stagnate after the pandemic?

In a Business of Fashion article, experts contextualize the stagnating numbers with student loan payments restarting this month and savings accrued from the pandemic beginning to dwindle. In the shifting market of spenders, brands struggle to balance exclusivity and accessibility. Early this year, Chanel increased their handbag prices by 14 percent and experienced public pushback. Their defense? An increased cost in materials.

The luxury market fluctuates more than ever as fashion houses shuffle through their creative directors. The Spring/Summer 2024 season was a space for directorial debuts and goodbyes. Sarah Burton exits Alexander McQueen after 25 years with the brand. De Sarno leaves Valentino and debuts his first Gucci collection. Gabriela Hearst takes her final bow at Chloe, and Chemena Kamali replaces her. Moschino announces Davide Renne as new creative director.

The back-alleys of luxury fashion are filled with whispers, speculating which direction the newly appointed directors will go. De Sarno swaps the maximalist Gucci girl for a more timeless rendition reminiscent of Tom Ford’s Gucci. Leather embossed logos on trapeze silhouettes, micro shorts paired with sweatshirts, and a rendition of the Jackie Bag’s clasp, swapping the piston closure for a bolt snap, are key standouts in the collection. De Sarno seems to play it safe until the cash rolls back for the Italian brand.

As the luxury market stagnates, recent collections focus on commerciality. Fendi’s Resort 2024 collection, which falls under the LVMH umbrella, collaborates with Stefano Pilati, formerly the head designer at Saint Laurent. In the collaboration, pieces compared to 2023’s Resort are toned down, featuring pencil a-line skirts, dropped waistlines, and logo-integrated blazers. For its unconventional elements, the collection contains detached lapels on slouchy suits and men wearing camisoles. The average wearer of Jones and Pilati's creations appears to be someone comfortably situated in the corporate offices of Wall Street.

Notably, the commercial route is working for Maria Grazia and Dior. However, only time can tell where luxury retail will shift.